The New Homo erectus Pelvis From Gona

As both Kambiz and Hawks have pointed out, a new Homo erectus pelvis has been discovered in Gona.


The find dates to 0.9-1.4 million years ago and is nearly complete. Also found were the sacrum and last lumbar vertebra. A number of traits link the pelvis to H. erectus, these include a robust iliac pillar, sigmoid shaped iliac spine, transversely broad with laterally flaring ilia. The sacrum has alae that are anteroposteriorly broad and has a robust sacral tuberosity.
The find has attracted a lot of attention for several reasons. First, the pelvis is that of a female – based on a wide greater sciatic notch, subpubic angle, ventral arc – and stature estimates indicate the she was quite short and had a broad trunk. This indicates that sexual dimorphism was greater than some had thought. I say some because the discovery of KNM-ER 42700 last year and KNM-OL 45500 four years ago indicate that there is more to the body size story. Previously, and based in large part on the KNM-WT-15000 skeleton H. erectus was though to be adapted to tropical environments and/or endurance running. The new pelvis (dubbed BSN49/P27) does not display adaptations for either of these. Second, the find has some implications for the evolution of the human brain and life history. Those of you who read my post on Neanderthal life history will know some of the basics. What we would like to know is how big of a baby could H. erectus birth? The answer to that question will tell us something about how their brain grows. Simpson et al estimate that BSN49/P27 could have birthed a baby with a brain volume of about 300-315 ml. This is about 30-50% that of an adult. By comparison, chimps are born with brains ~40% that of an adult, while humans are born with brains ~24% that of adults. In chimps this figure rises to ~72% by age three, while humans don’t reach this value until age five. An alert reader may remember this post, where I linked to several papers that discussed this issue based on endocranial capacity of the Mojokerto child. At any rate, my take on it is that this new estimate seems to support Leigh’s position – although I haven’t quite made up my mind about it. There are some confounding variables, such as maternal body size, energetics, and nutrition that have make things a little more difficult (and I will have more to say about that in a couple of posts in the near future).
As an added sidenote, if you ask a creationist pain in childbirth is all due to Eve eating an apple. The problem is that some species of macaques, some species of capuchins, and squirrel monkeys all experience the cephalopelvic issues humans face, so one would like to know what they did to piss God off…

About these ads

7 Responses

  1. he he he – you said ‘erectus’ and ‘pelvis’ in the same sentence…

    Oh, and Japanese female Macques engage in tons of lesbian sex. Maybe that’s why god hates them.

  2. er, macaques

  3. Oh yeah? If we evolved from Erectus, then why are there still creationists around?
    Excellent post as usual – thanks.
    Here is a link to further study of the erectus trunk:
    http://www.lyriczz.com/lyrics/Mc-Hammer/38751-I-Like-Big-Butts/

  4. keyboard kill to J-Dog
    fusilier
    James 2:24

  5. J-Dog – Now, see, when I read the paper I thought of DaveScot and the Inuit…

  6. the cephalopelvic issues humans face
    I have huge cephalopelvic issues. Whenever I see a particularly fine female pelvic area, my cephalic volume contracts to about 33% of normal.

  7. No, no, my dears, you’ve misunderstood the whole story, I’m afraid. God says, “Don’t eat that, kids.” And kids go and eat that, due to Temptation (which looks like Snakey-poo). So, side effects being what they are, kids now have lost their innocence. Sans innocence they (1) have sex; (2) have babies (owie for Evie); (3) have to work (pooh! for Adamie). And it doesn’t matter whether Evie is human, macaque, lioness, peahen, or squid, it’s owie, owie, owie! Do you see? It’s a Just So story, my dears.
    But as for Mrs. erectus, the really interesting bit is not so much big was Junior’s head, but whether it turned on the way out, and, if so, how many times? Lucy’s Junior, though chimp-sized, must have turned its noggin to the side on the way out, you see, but that’s it. Mrs. sapiens has a Junior whose head has to turn twice to negotiate the narrows.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers

%d bloggers like this: